|
Click here to download a PDF of all the
FAQs
1. How was the plan developed?
- In August 2003, the Superintendent and Board of
Education identified a Comprehensive Facility Plan as a major goal
for 2003-2004.
- Through a comprehensive facilities assessment
by architects and engineers at all district buildings, the 2002
Facilities Plan was updated to reflect current needs.
- Widespread input was sought from the community,
parents, staff and students through a series of well-attended
community dialogues and surveys.
- A high school Concept Design Team, comprised of
community members, parents, staff and students, examined best
practices and developed initial program recommendations for
addressing overcrowding and instructional initiatives at the
districtâs comprehensive high schools.
- Extensive research was conducted on enrollment
projections, pre-K-12 best practices, high school program designs,
technology infusion and an analysis of operational costs.
2. What are the major features of this plan?
- New comprehensive 1600 student high school
- Remodeling of Pioneer and Huron
to respond to new student capacity and program upgrades
- Modernization and improvements to all
schools, K-12
- Early Childhood Development Centers
- Centralized preschool in a remodeled facility
- Tuition based preschool at seven satellite centers
- Expanded, extended day option Kindergarten
- Up to date technology for every student
and teacher in every school
- Extensive upgrades at Scarlett Middle
School to create a model, community centered middle school
- New bus purchases
- Musical instrument replacements
3. How does this plan differ from the one proposed
in June 2002?
-
In 2002 a bond proposal to expand Huron and Pioneer high schools to address overcrowding was
defeated. In response, administration developed the June 14, 2004
bond proposal which includes construction of a third comprehensive
high school as well as renovations to every building in the
district.
-
The process to form the June 2004 proposal
included wide spread community and staff involvement through
public forums. The final plan was developed through a consensus
building process.
-
Because a substantial portion of the current bond debt is
scheduled to be retired
as this new bond proposal is initiated, the millage rate for
taxpayers (sinking fund and bond) is expected to be reduced from current
rates.
-
A thorough review of financial projections
persuaded the Board of Education and administrators that operating a third high school is financially
feasible.
4. Does the Board of Education support the proposal?
On March 11, 2004, the Board voted to proceed with a June 14, 2004
bond and sinking fund proposal. On April 28, 2004, the Board placed the
two proposals on the June ballot.
5. Why not just focus on solving the high school
issue? Is an entire Facilities Plan necessary given the current economic
times?
Through input at the community public forums, it became clear that
there is demand for physical improvements at all grade levels.
6. How are neighboring districts addressing the
aging and overcrowded nature of their school buildings?
Several neighboring districts in Washtenaw County are undertaking
similar improvements to address issues of aging and overcrowded buildings. Chelsea, Dexter,
Milan, Saline and Whitmore Lake, for example, have construction underway
or have bond elections pending.
7. Why is building a third comprehensive high
school a better choice than expanding Pioneer and Huron?
Voters in the 2002 bond election clearly voiced their opposition to
expanding Huron and Pioneer. In addition, large high schools diminish
the ability of staff to effectively serve all students. The Board has
concluded based on research which has
shown that both instructional and extracurricular programs are adversely
impacted in large high schools.
8. How many students will the new high school
accommodate?
9. Where will the new high school be located?
The district is recommending land that it currently owns at Maple/
M-14 as the site for the new high school. This site was chosen
primarily because the district already owns it and it meets key
criteria. The site has been thoroughly evaluated by
experts including architects, engineers and construction professionals.
Their consensus is that this location meets all major criteria,
including: educational programming, aesthetics, safety, air quality,
noise, traffic, water, sewer, storm water, utilities, zoning and
annexation. Site feasibility studies assure this project can be
effectively and safely sited here within the bond and operating budget. In addition, the City of Ann Arborâs master plan has long
recommended that the site be used for a high school.
10. Will road improvements be needed? If so, where
will the funding come from?
Normal road improvements such as acceleration, deceleration, and left
turn lanes on Maple Road are envisioned. These improvements are funded
within the bond proposal.
11. Some residents have recommended a location in
Pittsfield Township for the new high school. Was it considered?
Yes, the Pittsfield Township site met many of the criteria, but its
major drawback is that the district does not own
it. Pittsfield Township has not planned for the site to be a high
school. The site has water and sewer in the proximity, but it is not
included in the Townshipâs sewer district. Therefore, this would require
additional connection costs.
12. What will be done to protect the wetlands that
adjoin the proposed new high school location?
The major wetlands on the site will be protected. In addition to
having two wetlands studies conducted, we have walked the site with
representatives of the City to get a close-up look at the wetlands and
the areaâs other natural features. Itâs important to note that less than
65 percent of the total site will be used for building purposes. The
district plans to leave the remaining acreage accessible to the
community. The likelihood of selling any of the land is limited because
of wetlands and other natural features.
13. Won't all the new building projects in the bond
create more storm water problems for the Huron River Watershed?
While building in and of itself does impact the water quality, the
district is committed to safe and effective storm water management. Our
program will address the storm water management techniques of the past
including slowing and filtering storm water before it reaches the river.
14. What will be done to prevent traffic problems at
or near the new high school?
The safety of drivers, passengers and pedestrians ö along with other
traffic issues - have been discussed with experts from the City of Ann
Arbor, Washtenaw County, and an independent traffic engineer. All of
them agree that the Maple / Mi-14 site will be workable and safe from a
traffic standpoint. Improvements to the road are planned.
15. How will the addition of the new high school
affect the average class size?
Planning for the new high school anticipates that class sizes do not
exceed current levels.
16. Will the new high school be designed to be
ãgreenä?
The new high school will be designed and constructed by architects
and construction managers that are certified by the U.S. Green Building
Council's Leadership in Environmental and Energy Design (LEED) program. The building and site will seek LEED certification, which will ensure
adherence to the highest national standards.
17. When will drawings or models of the proposed new
high school be made public?
Drawings, models and final plans will be developed after the bond is
approved.
18. What is the projected increase in the overall
operating budget for three comprehensive high schools versus two?
Based on extensive staff review and external research, the projected
increase in operating expenses due to the new high school will be
approximately $3.7 million, which is in alignment with new high schools
in other districts. The breakdown follows:
| |
Instructional Staff |
(33%) |
| |
Administration |
( 3%) |
| |
Other Support Staff |
(36%) |
| |
Other Non-Salary Costs |
(28%)
|
19. What are the features of the upgrades to Pioneer
and Huron High Schools?
The goal for the three comprehensive high schools is to have equity
in curricular and extracurricular programs. Each school will be designed
with the flexibility for smaller learning communities. Some of the
specific benefits at Huron and Pioneer include:
Huron High School Improvements
- Enrollment will be reduced by over 400 students reducing
congestion.
- Re-locating administrators throughout the building puts them
closer to the students.
- Remodeling of auditorium and construction of ãblack boxä theater.
- Construction of new chemistry lab.
- Seamless infusion of instructional technology will support all
curriculum offerings.
Pioneer High School Improvements
- Enrollment will be reduced by over 1,000 students, eliminating
overcrowding.
- Greater building flexibility enables more varied teaching
opportunities.
- Relocating administrators throughout the building puts them closer
to the students.
- Seamless infusion of instructional technology reinforces all
curriculum offerings.
20. Does the new plan eliminate the need for
portable units?
The plan calls for the elimination of all portable units at the high
school level.
21. How do you plan to provide ãsmall learning
communitiesä at Pioneer and Huron?
There will be four pods created to accommodate clusters of
administrators, counselors, secretaries, and support staff serving each
small learning community. There are four classrooms with flexible walls
for each small learning community.
22. If renovation/construction work will occur
during the school year, how will disruptions be kept to a minimum?
Our Construction Managers, the Barton Malow Company and Granger
Construction have proven track records for successfully and safely
delivering projects in the midst of K-12 campuses, in and adjacent to
congested and occupied areas, without interfering with day-to-day
operations or pedestrian safety. This includes an ever-vigilant focus on
safety needs, including effective directional signage relating to
students, staff, administration, and the general public as well as
separation of construction from the school environment through
barricades and fencing.
Other methods used to minimize disruptions include:
- Reviewing preconstruction plans and project scope documents with
administrators, building principals and custodians.
- Meetings with staff during ãconstruction over coffeeä meetings
before classes start to give them a chance to share their concerns
(one-on-one) both during project planning and during construction.
- Meetings with student newspaper staff to publicize project plans
to students.
- Meetings with PTAs and PTOs to explain construction activities to
parents.
- Posting schedule plans for staff, students, and parents to view
within their respective school buildings.
23. How can you ensure parity among three
comprehensive high schools?
All three schools will have complete comprehensive high school
facilities including theaters, music rooms, art rooms, Career and Tech
Ed rooms, media centers, gyms, athletic fields, a pool, and a football
stadium. All three will have a complete offering of academic and
elective courses with the same departments that exist in the current
schools.
There are currently some differences between Huron and Pioneer in the
sense that each school has particular strengths based on staff
experience and expertise and the unique history of each school. A
similar dynamic will occur with a third school. Most staff members will
come from the existing schools and will bring their unique strengths
with them.
24. What aspects of the new high school will help
attract and retain students and staff?
Classrooms will be flexible
learning spaces incorporating technology as an integrated learning tool.
Liberal use of natural lighting and individually adjustable heating and
cooling units should create a comfortable place to teach and learn.
Science labs will have appropriate furniture and equipment to allow
students to conduct both hands-on experiments as well as computer
simulations. Classrooms, media center and computer labs will allow all
access to technology. The Media Center will be the Îhubâ of the
learning environment. Easy access to print and electronic reference
material will facilitate the studentsâ research.
Specialty curricular and extra-curricular opportunities and spaces
will be designed with future flexibility in mind.
Corridors will be designed to encourage easy ãway-finding.ä
Administrative offices will be located to provide easy accessibility
to the students and allow visitors to be identified as they enter the
building.
25. How were the K-12 Modernization projects
determined and prioritized?
Staff at each school were involved in developing an
improvement/renovation list using the 2001 Facilities Plan as a starting
point. The construction manager, building principal and facilities staff
toured each school to prioritize the plan.
26. What programming changes or new options for
early childhood are being proposed?
To reflect projected growth and enrollment factors at the preschool
and kindergarten level, to promote school readiness,
the district is committed to providing expanded early childhood choices.
Options that are being proposed include an expanded day tuition based
Kindergarten that will provide a half day enrichment program.
Tuition based preschool will be expanded to seven elementary sites
(Allen, Dicken, Lakewood, Mitchell, Thurston, Wines, and Northside
Elementary Schools) as well as a central location (Balas II & Balas III)
that will continue to include services for special needs students. Site
locations will ensure accessibility for all families. The new programs
will be self sufficient with respect to staffing and operational costs.
27. Why has Scarlett been identified for special
treatment?
To support the districtâs goal to increase achievement, Scarlett was
selected to become a Model Middle School including a community center
that will incorporate math, science and technology programming. The
district seeks to support the staff, students, and community to improve
achievement, enrollment and overall reputation.
28. What upgrades will occur at Scarlett Middle
School?
The goal is to recreate Scarlett as a model, community-centered
middle school.
- 1:1 student to computer ratio (District ratio 1:3)
- Tech Hub in Media Center
- Facility enhancement
- Remodeling of every classroom
- New entrance and lobby
- New and expanded cafetorium
- High tech accommodations throughout
29. How will Special Education programs benefit from
the plan?
All projects will address accessibility and Americanâs with
Disabilities Act (ADA) standards. Many special education classrooms are
remodeled and improved. The Technology plan calls for equity of access
for special education students including assistive technology in every
classroom.
30. What are the features of the technology
upgrades?
- A 1:3 computing ratio at every school
- Wireless technology in all buildings
- New equipment including printers, projectors, DVD players, digital
cameras, scanners, classroom sound systems and video cameras
- Sound field technology for amplification of teacherâs voice in
every class
- Technology implementation in coordination with the Districtâs
student achievement plan
- Parity in student access to technology
- 5 year hardware replacement schedule
- Assisted technology for special education students
31. Where does Ann Arbor stand with instructional
technology in comparison to other districts?
According to State of Michigan benchmark data, Ann Arbor is
significantly behind similar districts in the availability of technology
tools for students and teachers. This need was a high priority among
staff, parents, and other community dialogue participants.
32. Your plans call for replacing technology at all
schools on a five-year cycle. With technology advancing so rapidly, is
five years often enough?
A five-year cycle is an improvement over what we have now. Some
computer equipment in the district is over ten years old. We are eager
to improve on the five-year replacement cycle, but need to work within
budget parameters.
33. How will you make sure that students have equal
access to computers and other tools?
The plan calls for every school in the district to be at the
same technology standard. The Districtâs Technology Plan includes a
computer count at each building, by teacher and student. An allocation
plan for classroom, lab and media center computers as well as all other
proposed technology tools, has been completed using those counts. Cost
allocations for the purchase of this equipment have been included in the
bond program. Passage of the bond will allow implementation of the
plan.
34. What are the plans for the current bus fleet?
The bond proposal calls for the purchase of 113 new buses to be added
over the next five years at a total expenditure of nearly $7 million.
This represents nearly 90 percent of the total fleet.
35. How many musical instruments will be replaced?
Approval of the bond will enable us to replace approximately one-half
of the districtâs musical instrument inventory.
36. Whatâs the rationale behind including musical
instrument replacement in a facilities plan?
Typically these items have been paid for from the operating fund. Using
bond dollars allows the district to free up more operating funds to
replace old instruments.
37. What administrative facility changes are
proposed?
District administrative staff, currently located in Balas II and
Balas III will be relocated to Pioneer High School.
38. What is the schedule for each component of the
sinking fund and bond programs?
(Please Note: the following represents preliminary information that
is subject to change. Start dates were determined based on need.)
|
|
Facility |
Target Start |
Target Completion |
|
|
New High School |
March Î05 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Allen Elementary |
May Î05 |
September Î06 |
|
|
Haisley Elementary |
May Î05 |
September Î06 |
|
|
Thurston Elementary |
May Î05 |
September Î06 |
|
|
New Pre-School (Balas 2+3) |
June Î05 |
August Î06 |
|
|
Scarlett Middle School |
August Î05 |
December Î06 |
|
|
Bryant Elementary |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Dicken Elementary |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Lawton Elementary |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Mitchell Elementary |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Pittsfield Elementary |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Clague Middle School |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Slauson Middle School |
May Î06 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Stone Alternative High School |
May Î06 |
March Î07 |
|
|
Huron High School |
December Î06 |
November Î08 |
|
|
Pioneer High School |
December Î06 |
November Î08 |
|
|
Clemente High School |
March Î07 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Community High School |
March Î07 |
August Î07 |
|
|
Abbot Elementary |
May Î07 |
August Î08 |
|
|
Angell Elementary |
May Î07 |
August Î08 |
|
|
Ann Arbor Open @ Mack |
May Î07 |
August Î08 |
|
|
Burns Park Elementary |
May Î07 |
August Î08 |
|
|
Lakewood Elementary |
May Î07 |
August Î08 |
|
|
Pattengill Elementary |
May Î07 |
August Î 08 |
|
|
Bach Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Carpenter Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Eberwhite Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
King Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Logan Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Northside Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Wines Elementary |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Forsythe Middle School |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Tappan Middle School |
May Î08 |
August Î09 |
|
|
Balas 1 Administration |
June Î08 |
September Î08 |
39. How much in construction dollars (both bond and
sinking fund) are being spent at each school?
(All construction amounts include bond and sinking fund dollars where
applicable. Technology dollars are also included in the per building
amounts)
| |
Facility |
Budgeted Estimates |
| |
New High School |
$84,140,000 |
| |
Allen Elementary |
$3,187,000 |
| |
Haisley Elementary |
$4,049,500 |
| |
Thurston Elementary |
$4,332,400 |
| |
New Pre-School (Balas
2+3) |
$10,348,000 |
| |
Scarlett Middle School |
$10,688,000 |
| |
Bryant Elementary |
$1,794,100 |
| |
Dicken Elementary |
$3,688,800 |
| |
Lawton Elementary |
$2,459,900 |
| |
Mitchell Elementary |
$2,227,400 |
| |
Pittsfield Elementary |
$2,418,900 |
| |
Clague Middle School |
$5,322,100 |
| |
Slauson Middle School |
$6,097,500 |
| |
Stone Alternative High
School |
$2,975,700 |
| |
Huron High School |
$16,758,100 |
| |
Pioneer High School |
$12,135,800 |
| |
Clemente High School |
$1,359,500 |
| |
Community High School |
$1,856,600 |
| |
Abbot Elementary |
$2,647,200 |
| |
Angell Elementary |
$2,061,300 |
| |
Ann Arbor Open @ Mack |
$3,535,800 |
| |
Burns Park Elementary |
$3,998,100 |
| |
Lakewood Elementary |
$3,085,100 |
| |
Pattengill Elementary |
$2,589,200 |
| |
Bach Elementary |
$2,882,700 |
| |
Carpenter Elementary |
$2,126,500 |
| |
Eberwhite Elementary |
$3,005,000 |
| |
King Elementary |
$2,242,800 |
| |
Logan Elementary |
$3,392,900 |
| |
Northside Elementary |
$2,763,900 |
| |
Wines Elementary |
$3,476,000 |
| |
Forsythe Middle School |
$5,447,800 |
| |
Tappan Middle School |
$4,491,900 |
| |
Balas 1 Administration |
$6,913,800 |
40. What is the breakdown of total costs for the
bond program?
|
New Construction |
$68,868,100 |
|
Remodeling |
$49,246,000 |
|
Contingency |
$9,035,100 |
|
Technology |
$20,000,000 |
|
Loose Furniture & Equipment |
$9,835,900 |
|
Busses |
$7,000,000 |
|
Site Work |
$18,097,900 |
|
A/E Fees and Costs |
$11,317,500 |
|
CM Fees and Costs |
$9,099,500 |
|
|
|
|
Total Project Costs |
$202,500,000 |
|
Election/Issue Costs |
$6,831,252 |
|
|
|
|
Grand Total |
$209,331,252 |
|
Minus Estimated Interest Earned |
($3,866,252) |
|
|
|
|
Amount of Proposed Bond Issue |
$205,465,000 |
41. What are your goals for ãmarketingä the
district, i.e. how many new students do you expect to attract?
The district has set a goal to increase enrollment by two percent by
2006. In addition, we are convinced that the new high school and early
childhood centers, the new technology tools, and the improvements to all
buildings will attract many more students to our schools.
42. What are the benefits of the bond issue for
residents who donât have students in the district?
A third comprehensive high school will free up time and space for
community use at the existing high schools.
43. How much will the proposal cost the average
taxpayer?
If both the bond and the sinking fund proposals are approved, the
average homeownerâs taxes should be reduced by an estimated .20 mills in 2005 compared
to 2004 because other debt is being retired at the same time. A homeowner can use the following calculation to
estimate
their individual tax reduction:
¸ of Home Market Value or Taxable Value X -.20 / 1,000
For instance, if a house market value is $200,000, the tax reduction
will be calculated on ¸ value or $100,000. The calculation: $100,000 X
-.20 / 1,000 = -$20/year or a tax decrease of $20 per year.
The reduction occurs because old debt and the 2002 sinking fund are
being removed from tax calculations at a rate greater than the cost of
the new proposals.
|
|
Home Market Value |
Home Taxable Value |
25 yr. Bond Proposal Annual Estimated Increase |
5 yr. Sinking Fund Annual Decrease |
Estimated Combined Proposals Annual Decrease |
|
|
$200,000 |
$100,000 |
$30 |
($50) |
($20) |
|
|
$300,000 |
$150,000 |
$45 |
($75) |
($30) |
|
|
$400,000 |
$200,000 |
$60 |
($100) |
($40) |
|
|
$500,000 |
$250,000 |
$75 |
($125) |
($50) |
44. Economically, why is this a good time for a bond
issue?
Financial consultants concur that this is an excellent time for a
bond issue. Bond interest rates are at or near the lowest level in nearly 40
years. Additionally, the economic slowdown tends to drive down building
costs. If rates hold, these two factors allow us to stretch our bond dollars and
maximize the investment of tax dollars.
45. How will the district operate a third
comprehensive high school?
Currently the district pays for various capital improvement projects
through an existing operating fund called Capital Needs. With the
approval of the bond and sinking fund millages, projects previously funded
through the Capital Needs budget would now be funded through these new millages. Examples include bus purchases, musical instruments and
various building upgrades. This reallocation frees up dollars to operate
a third high school.
46. What is the difference between a bond issue and
a sinking fund millage?
A bond issue is a lump-sum dollar amount that the district borrows,
through the sale of bonds, in order to fund capital projects (such as
building construction, district-wide technology implementation, etc.).
Taxpayers pay the money back over a period of years, with interest;
similar to a home mortgage.
A sinking fund millage is a limited property tax, considered a
ãpay-as-you-goä method, for addressing building remodeling projects. State law allows a district to levy up to five mils, for no longer than
20 years. It is more like a debit-card or home equity credit line where
you can access the money on-hand to pay for projects as they are
completed. The district will not be paying interest for the money used.
The State of Michigan has legal requirements, restrictions and
guidelines for public school districts that plan to fund capital
enhancements or facility repairs through bond issues and sinking fund
millage levies. The law is very specific about what is considered an
allowable use and what reporting and audit requirements are expected.
47. Will money from the bond proposal or the sinking
fund be used to pay teacher salaries and benefits?
No. School districts are not allowed to use funds from a bond issue
for operating expenses such as teacher, administrator or employee
salaries. Bond funds and sinking funds must be kept separate from
operating funds.
48. Explain what the sinking fund can and cannot
cover?
Sinking funds may be used for purposes for which bonds may be issued
including purchasing, erecting, completing, remodeling or repairing
facilities, or parts of or additions to those facilities; acquiring,
preparing, developing, improving or repairing sites, or part of or
additions to sites, for school buildings, structures, athletic
facilities, playgrounds, or other facilities; and technology
infrastructure. Technology in this case refers to wiring or materials
used for installing technology. It does not include the equipment or
software. This fund may be used for repair, but not for maintenance.
49. Why is the district proposing both a bond and
sinking fund?
The Board of Education looked at several different funding options
and decided on the combination of bond and sinking funds as the most
prudent use of taxpayer dollars. Based on a pay-as-you-go arrangement,
the sinking fund eliminates the extra burden of interest payments and
provides for annual accountability for projects. The district has
demonstrated a track record of completing promised projects as evidenced
by the annual Sinking Fund Report card issued to the community each May.
Because of the proven success and support of the past sinking fund, the
district wishes to renew this source on a short-term approval (5-years)
and to continue to make a variety of improvements to district
facilities.
The bond provides funding up-front to immediately address
overcrowding at the high schools, technology infusion at all levels and
upgrades to other K-12 buildings.
50. How will the proposed financing plan be divided
between the bond and the sinking fund?
The ballot will include a request for a $205,465,000 bond for
projects such as the new high school, classroom additions, technology
upgrades and other major. The sinking fund will be a request for 1.00
mil, which is estimated to generate about $35 million over a 5-year
period for smaller projects throughout the district.
51. For which specific projects will the proposed
sinking fund be used?
The sinking fund projects include mechanical and electrical upgrades
for Ann Arborâs 21 elementary schools, 5 middle schools and 5 high
schools. Mechanical upgrades improve student comfort through appropriate
heating and cooling and air quality. Typical projects include new
boilers, new classroom ventilators, replacing rooftop air handling
units, replacing plumbing fixtures, and air conditioning elementary
school media centers and computer labs. Electrical upgrades support
technology objectives and improve classroom environments. Projects
include replacing outdated electrical equipment, installing security and
fire alarm systems and replacing interior lighting in classrooms, as
needed.
52. How will the bond and sinking fund question
appear on the ballot in June?
CAPITAL PROJECTS BOND PROPOSAL
Shall the Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor, County of
Washtenaw, Michigan, borrow the principal sum of not to exceed Two
Hundred Five Million Four Hundred Sixty-Five Thousand Dollars
($205,465,000) and issue its general obligation unlimited tax bonds for
the purpose of defraying the cost of making the following improvements:
- constructing, furnishing and equipping a new comprehensive high
school building and improving and developing the site therefor,
including outdoor athletic fields and facilities;
- constructing, furnishing and equipping additions to School
District buildings, including additions for early childhood programs;
- remodeling, equipping, furnishing, reequipping and refurnishing
existing School District buildings;
- acquiring and installing technology equipment in the School
District;
- acquiring musical instruments and school buses; and
- improving and developing sites, including athletic facilities,
fields and playgrounds in the School District?
The estimated millage to be levied in 2005 to service this issue of
bonds is 1.88 mills ($1.88 per $1,000 of taxable value) and the
estimated simple average annual millage rate required to retire the
bonds of this issue is 1.58 mills ($1.58 per $1,000 of taxable value). The bonds may be issued in one or more series, payable in the case of
each series in not to exceed 25 years from the date of issue of such
series. The debt millage levy required to retire all bonds of the
School District currently outstanding and proposed by this ballot
proposal is currently estimated to be at or below 2.29 mills.
(Under state law, bond proceeds may not be used to pay teacher or
administrator salaries, routine maintenance costs or other School
District operating expenses.)
SINKING FUND MILLAGE PROPOSAL
Shall the Public Schools of the City of Ann Arbor, County of
Washtenaw, Michigan, be authorized to levy 1.00 mill to create a sinking
fund for the purpose of the construction or repair of school buildings
and the improvement and development of sites, increasing the limitation
on the amount of taxes which may be imposed on taxable property in the
School District for a period of five (5) years, the years 2005 to 2009,
inclusive? It is estimated that 1.00 mill ($1.00 per $1,000 of taxable
valuation) would raise approximately $6,645,000 in the first year that
it is levied.
(Under state law, sinking fund proceeds may not be used to pay
teacher or administrator salaries.)
53. What are the key dates leading up to the June
vote?
| |
Final Day to Register to
Vote |
Monday, May 17, 2004
5 p.m. |
| |
Absentee Ballot Apps.
Available |
Tuesday, May 25, 2004 |
| |
Absentee Ballots Must Be
Returned |
Saturday, June 12, 2004
2 p.m. |
| |
Election Day |
Monday, June 14, 2004 7
a.m.-8 p.m. |
54. Where and when do I register to vote?
To vote in the June 14, 2004 Regular School Election, a person must
be:
- a resident of the Ann Arbor Public School District
- registered to vote by the voter registration deadline of Monday
May 17, 5:00 PM.
To register to vote, a person must be:
- a U.S. citizen
- at least 18 years of age by election day
- a resident of Michigan and the city or township where you are
applying to vote
Printable voter registration forms are available on the Secretary of
State web site: (Click here to open the form directly) or you may register in person with your city, township, or
county clerk or at any Secretary of State office.
NOTE: anyone using "mail-in" voter registration process MUST vote in
person the FIRST time they vote (no absentee voting allowed at the first
election).
Local clerk phone numbers and addresses:
- Washtenaw County Clerk: 222-6730, 200 North Main Street, Ann Arbor
- Ann Arbor City Clerk: 994-2725, 100 North Fifth Avenue, Ann Arbor
- Ann Arbor Township Clerk: 663-3418,3792 Pontiac Trail, Ann Arbor
- Lodi Township Clerk: 665-7583, 3755 Pleasant Lake Road, Ann Arbor
- Northfield Township Clerk: 449-2880, 75 Barker Road, Whitmore Lake
- Pittsfield Township Clerk: 822-3120, 6201 West Michigan Ave., Ann
Arbor
- Salem Township Clerk: 1 248 349-1690, 9600 Six Mile Road, Salem
- Scio Township Clerk: 665-2123, 827 North Zeeb Road, Ann Arbor
- Superior Township Clerk: 482-6099, 3040 North Prospect Road,
Ypsilanti
- Webster Township Clerk: 426-5103, 5655 Webster Church Road, Dexter
55. What is the procedure for absentee voting?
Absentee Ballot Applications will be available at all Ann Arbor
Public School buildings, district libraries, and city and township clerk
offices beginning on Tuesday, May 25, 2004. Complete the application and
return it to the address shown at the top of the application. An
Absentee Ballot will be then mailed to you. If you return the
application in person to the school election office no later than 2 p.m.
on Saturday, June 12, 2004, you will receive a ballot and be allowed to
vote at that time.
56. Has the district selected the professional firms
that will design and construct these projects?
A competitive qualification and review process was used to select
both the architects and the construction managers.
- New High School & High School Renovation
- Mitchell and Mouat & TMP Associates öArchitectural Design
- Granger Construction ö Construction Manager
- Pre K ö 8 Renovations
- Fanning/Howey and JJR Associates- Architectural Design
- Barton Malow Company - Construction Manager
57. If I have questions not covered in this website,
where can I get additional information?
Contact the Districtâs communication department director, Liz
Margolis at 734/994-2236 or email at
margolis@aaps.k12.mi.us.
|